. bør også være konsekvensen.
UT av WHO – FN – WEF – NATO – EU – EØS osv. bør også være konsekvensen.
Open in app or onlinePandemic Treaty FACTSI encourage everyone to actually read the ZERO DRAFT of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” so that you can truly be aware of the FACTS.JAMES ROGUSKIAPR 3 SAVE▷ LISTEN photo credit: takecontrol.substack.com/p/the-who-pandemic-treatyShareLeave a commentUpgrade to paidPlease watch the video below…The documents and recordings of the fifth meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (April 3-6, 2023) are available here:https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/e/e_inb-5.htmlTHE WRONG TOPICS ARE BEING NEGOTIATED!The negotiations BEGIN WITH THE FLAWED PREMISE that we should all ignore the devastating effects of RT-PCR “tests,” Midazolam, ventilators, Run-death-is-near (remdesivir), and genetic-experiment-bioweapons that failed miserably and caused irreparable harm to millions of victims.Not only were restrictions such as masking, social distancing, travel restrictions, quarantines, curfews and/or lockdowns NON-effective, they were absolutely damaging, and even deadly, in many ways.The top 15 reasons to oppose the negotiation of a “Pandemic Treaty.”Download the flyer Uk Flyer240KB ∙ PDF FileDownloadDownload the Zero Draft of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdfZero Draft337KB ∙ PDF FileDownloadREGARDLESS OF WHERE ON EARTH YOU LIVE…I encourage everyone to share this article far and wide in order to help ensure that the debate in the UK House of Commons reflects the FACTS of the matter, not the propaganda!Share(Scroll down this page to take action on this issue, regardless of where you live.)On February 23, 2023, Andrew Bridgen requested that an urgent debate be held regarding the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”Then, Andrew Bridgen raised the issue of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.The propaganda pushback and ad hominem attacks began almost instantly!March 30, 2023The proposed pandemic treaty is scheduled to be debated on Monday 17 April 2023 at 4:30pm UK time (8:30am Pacific, 9:30am Mountain, 10:30am Central, 11:30 Eastern)WATCH IT HERE: https://www.youtube.com/UKParliamenthttps://whatson.parliament.uk/commons/2023-04-17/https://whatson.parliament.uk/event/cal42173Member of Parliament Nick Fletcher appears to be in charge of the debate on Monday 17 April 2023.https://members.parliament.uk/member/4832/contactI truly wonder if Andrew Bridgen will end up being the ONLY Member of Parliament with the courage to stand up in opposition to the globalists who support giving more power, money and control to the WHO.I have my suspicions that the “debate” that is scheduled to occur in the House of Commons on Monday 17 April 2023 is going to be filled with an enormous amount of propaganda designed to prop up the globalist agenda.I believe that the U.K. government is going to attempt to muddy the waters in an attempt to divert attention away from the truly important issues by belatedly responding to a petition that should have been addressed months ago, but has been ignored for nearly a year.The government of the United Kingdom is on course to have the wrong debate.They should NOT be debating the process by which such a treaty should be ratified.They should NOT be debating the “Pandemic Treaty.”Neither a “Pandemic Treaty” nor amendments to the International Health Regulations should be debated until all of the evils of the past 3+ years have been fully exposed and all the perpetrators of countless crimes against humanity have been brought to justice.The UK House of Commons should be conducting a post-mortem analysis of the events of the past 3+ years.If they were to discuss the FACTS, they would see that what is missing in the WHO negotiations is any discussion of the failures of the past 3+ years.BEFORE even contemplating a global “Pandemic Treaty” or sweeping amendments to the International Health Regulations, the best course of action for the people of the UK, and indeed the World, is to ensure that a full and effective examination of the WHO’s involvement in the COVID-19 pandemic response is undertaken and scrupulously reviewed, as well as the actions taken by every government on earth.ATTEMPTING TO NEGOTIATE AND AGREE TO A LEGALLY-BINDING AGREEMENT TO FINANCE AND ENFORCE DEMONSTRABLY FAILED POLICIES IS CLEARLY INSANE AND/OR EVIL.NO TREATY OR AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE NEGOTIATED.THE NEGOTIATIONS MUST STOP IMMEDIATELY.OFFICIAL PUBLIC PETITION:As of 16 May 2022 (less than two weeks after it was first circulated), Parliamentary Petition #614335 had received over 100,000 signatures, which should have caused a public debate to be scheduled in the House of Commons A LONG TIME AGO!https://web.archive.org/web/20220516215559/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/614335https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/614335To the best of my knowledge, the House of Commons FAILED to honor its duty to hold a public debate in response to this petition until NOW.https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9550/CBP-9550.pdfHouse Of Commons Research Briefing219KB ∙ PDF FileDownloadThe official government response to petition #614335 (27 May 2022):To protect lives, the economy and future generations from future pandemics, the UK government supports a new legally-binding instrument to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safe, and that effective global cooperation is needed to better protect the UK and other countries around the world from the detrimental health, social and economic impacts of pandemics and other health threats. The UK supports a new international legally-binding instrument as part of a cooperative and comprehensive approach to pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.At a World Health Assembly Special Session in late 2021, the 194 countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) agreed to launch a process to draft and negotiate a new instrument, through the auspices of WHO, to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. The negotiating process will be led by member states, including the UK. The instrument aims to improve how the world prevents, better prepares for, and responds to future disease outbreaks of pandemic potential at national, regional and global level. It would complement the existing international instruments which the UK has already agreed, such as the International Health Regulations. It would promote greater collective action and accountability. A treaty is an international agreement concluded between States or with international organisations in written form and governed by international law. The UK is party to a large number of multilateral treaties, including many through the United Nations (UN) and its specialised agencies such as the WHO. These instruments reflect obligations states have agreed to enter into to further common goals. The current target date for agreeing the text of the new instrument is at the World Health Assembly in May 2024. Over the next two years the UK aims to work towards building a consensus on how the global community can better prevent, prepare for, and respond to future pandemics and will actively shape, develop and negotiate the text. The new instrument would only be adopted by the World Health Assembly if the text achieves a two-thirds vote of the Health Assembly (Article 19 of the WHO Constitution). The Health Assembly is made up of representatives of WHO Member States. Once adopted, the instrument would only become binding on the UK if and when the UK accepts (ratifies) it in accordance with its constitutional process. In the UK this requires the treaty to be laid before Parliament for a period of 21 sitting days before the Government can ratify it on behalf of the UK. The Government always carefully considers whether domestic legislation will be required to implement the UK’s international obligations when negotiating a treaty. Not every treaty requires implementing legislation and it is too early to say if that would apply here. However, in all circumstances, the UK’s ability to exercise its sovereignty would remain unchanged and the UK would remain in control of any future domestic decisions about national restrictions or other measures.If changes to UK law were considered necessary or appropriate to reflect obligations under the treaty, proposals for domestic legislation would go through the usual Parliamentary process and the UK would not ratify the treaty until domestic measures, agreed by Parliament, were in place. This process of ratification allows scrutiny by elected representatives of both the treaty and any appropriate domestic legislation in accordance with the UK’s constitutional arrangements. The Government does not consider a referendum is necessary, appropriate or in keeping with precedent for such an agreement.Foreign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeRESPONSES:COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safeNo one is safe until all of the perpetrators of the massive crimes against humanity are behind bars.The UK supports a new international legally-binding instrument as part of a cooperative and comprehensive approach to pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.Why doesn’t the UK support an investigation into the harmful effects of Midazolam, Remdesivir, the use of ventilators and the COVID-19 “vaccines?”It would promote greater collective action and accountability.No one is held accountable until everyone is held accountable.The World Health Organization has CLEARLY been ignoring the will of the people.“Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.”-The preamble to the Constitution of the World Health OrganizationOFFICIAL WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS:After less than 7 days notice, on 12-13 April, 2022 the World Health Organization received 33,884 comments from people around the world.https://inb.who.int/home/public-hearings/first-roundThe 33,884 written public comments are available HERE.On 1 June 2022, the INB cancelled a scheduled second public comment period because the vast majority (99+%) of the 33,884 comments were very much opposed to the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”The information about the canceled second public comment period is available HERE.OFFICIAL VIDEO SUBMISSIONS:After just 2 days notice, the WHO accepted public comment videos from September 9-16, 2023. Below is a collection of what people around the world had to say about the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”https://inb.who.int/home/public-hearings/second-roundTo view more videos, visit… ScrewTheWHO.comTo submit your video, CLICK HEREThe UK is represented at the WHO by the UK Mission to the WTO, UN and Other International Organisations (Geneva).https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/uk-mission-to-the-wto-un-and-other-international-organisations-genevaClick on the link below to send an email to each and every Member of Parliament.https://inhere.salsalabs.org/UKAction/index.html |
Leave a Reply